Jordan R. / C.R.D. survey
- JL
- Posts: 2610
- Joined: Thu May 22, 2003 8:57 am
- Location: Saanichton / Shirley (French Beach)
- Been thanked: 2 times
- Contact:
Jordan R. / C.R.D. survey
http://www.crd.bc.ca/surveys/Survey.asp ... 2b767c0e2e Some background: http://www.timescolonist.com/travel/Pub ... story.html
Last edited by JL on Fri Feb 24, 2012 8:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
Thermals are good.
- juandesooka
- Website Donor
- Posts: 704
- Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 3:44 pm
- Location: Sooke
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 11 times
- Contact:
lively...wouldn't count on it. It's a public forum to raise ideas ... so everyone gets to have their say, no matter how wacky or repetitive, and there's no attempt to filter or prioritize, or even correct misinformation. The prior meetings to stop the development proposal were more interesting ... as they were protesting something directly.
Here, the protest, such as it is, is pretty weak ... seems to be they want their cash-strapped saviours (CRD & TLC) to keep the whole parcel rather than selling some chunks off to save some money so they can afford to buy other higher priority properties. TLC's answer: "buck up buttercup, we are deep in debt to pay for the chunk we've already saved". Some interesting points made by the conservationist folks, but fundamentally all they were doing was re-protesting the BC gov't decision where they let WFP sell it ... valid complaint, but not the matter at hand.
All in all? I found it a bit of a waste of time, didn't learn anything.
Here, the protest, such as it is, is pretty weak ... seems to be they want their cash-strapped saviours (CRD & TLC) to keep the whole parcel rather than selling some chunks off to save some money so they can afford to buy other higher priority properties. TLC's answer: "buck up buttercup, we are deep in debt to pay for the chunk we've already saved". Some interesting points made by the conservationist folks, but fundamentally all they were doing was re-protesting the BC gov't decision where they let WFP sell it ... valid complaint, but not the matter at hand.
All in all? I found it a bit of a waste of time, didn't learn anything.
Any mention on what they plan on doing about the 'shack' that is located on the property? As much as the 'locals' are a pain sometimes, its gota suck to have yer clubhouse demolished and land taken away... Maybe that's why they've been pretty chill lately?!? FYI I even saw one on a SUP a while back!!!
well considering how they destroyed lives literally vacating the JDF trail and how that could easily have been grandfathered, I doubt they will show any consideration here I certainly would support them continuing to have their quaint huts there, doesn't bother me and it breathes life into an otherwise gravel and potholes kinda place maybe their "surfclub" can get some CRD sanction to remain but I bet they'd have to permit others to join or turn it into some form of charity group like the Kiwanis group at Willows but hey, why not?JasonD wrote:Any mention on what they plan on doing about the 'shack' that is located on the property? As much as the 'locals' are a pain sometimes, its gota suck to have yer clubhouse demolished and land taken away... Maybe that's why they've been pretty chill lately?!? FYI I even saw one on a SUP a while back!!!
Wish less, sail more!!
Vancouver Island Windsports
Chinook /Takuma /KA Australia (Tribal) /Aztron
You're either in or in the way....
Doing things the hard way since 1963....
Vancouver Island Windsports
Chinook /Takuma /KA Australia (Tribal) /Aztron
You're either in or in the way....
Doing things the hard way since 1963....
- downwind dave
- Website Donor
- Posts: 1469
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 9:05 am
- Location: Cobble Hill
Anybody go to the meeting in Victoria last night?
According to th TC article, sounds like similar ground covered in the Sooke meeting.
I have to say that I am in agreement with CRD parks selling off portions of the upland forested areas (all second growth) and using the proceeds to pay for other more desireable locations for CRD purchases. For example, Muir Creek area and access to shoreline still not protected.
In this regard Vicky Husband is against selling off portions of the JR CRD land purchase and claims she speaks for the majority, but she does not speak for me.
According to th TC article, sounds like similar ground covered in the Sooke meeting.
I have to say that I am in agreement with CRD parks selling off portions of the upland forested areas (all second growth) and using the proceeds to pay for other more desireable locations for CRD purchases. For example, Muir Creek area and access to shoreline still not protected.
In this regard Vicky Husband is against selling off portions of the JR CRD land purchase and claims she speaks for the majority, but she does not speak for me.
- JL
- Posts: 2610
- Joined: Thu May 22, 2003 8:57 am
- Location: Saanichton / Shirley (French Beach)
- Been thanked: 2 times
- Contact:
I'm with you Rick ... I put that on the survey http://www.crd.bc.ca/surveys/Survey.asp ... 2b767c0e2e
Thermals are good.